European Patent Office Clamps the Lid Down
on PCT Applications Filed by U.S. Tech Industry

by John M. Carson

Knobbe Martens Olsen & Bear LLP, San Diego

 
This year the European Patent Office announced that beginning March 1, 2002, it would no longer examine patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) by U.S. applicants which relate to telecommunications. In addition, after that date no EPO search or examination would be conducted on U.S.-originating PCT applications which relate to business methods or biotechnology.
 
The Patent Cooperation Treaty allows patent applicants to preserve the right to obtain foreign patents by filing a single, international application. It also provides a preliminary, non-binding opinion on patentability  while deferring the significant expenses associated with filing the application in individual foreign countries or regions. Through the PCT, the applicant obtains a search for references pertinent to the patentability of the claimed invention. A preliminary examination of the application can also be requested. Filing foreign applications through the PCT delays the expensive national stage of foreign patenting for up to 30 months from the earliest priority date claimed in the application.
 
Applicants from the United States (i.e., U.S. citizens or corporations) can file their PCT applications in either the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or the International Bureau in Geneva, Switzerland. In addition, prior to the announcement discussed below, all U.S. applicants had the option of designating either the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or the European Patent Office as the International Search Authority or the International Examining Authority. U.S. applicants would frequently designate the European Patent Office for search and examination so as to obtain a "second opinion" on patentability (in addition to the examination of the U.S. application) and to streamline the subsequent examination of the European application.
 
In response to a deluge of PCT applications from U.S. applicants, the European Patent Office recently announced that it would no longer conduct an international examination with respect to any PCT application relating to telecommunications, business methods or biotechnology filed by a national or resident of the United States of America in which the Demand for International Preliminary Examination is filed on or after March 1, 2002. Furthermore, no search will be conducted for PCT applications relating to business methods or biotechnology for such applicants where the PCT application is filed on or after March 1, 2002. Specifically, this announcement relates to PCT applications for such inventions filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or International Bureau in which at least one applicant is a U.S. national or resident and none of the applicants are nationals or residents of a European Patent Convention (EPC) contracting state. More details, including the definition of what constitutes subject matter for which this ruling applies, can be found at

 www.european-patent-office.org/epo/president/e/2001_12_11_e.htm.

Thus, while U.S. PCT applicants may still be able to obtain a European patent for such inventions (note that business method patents are not regularly granted) by filing a national application in the European Patent Office at the conclusion of the international PCT proceedings, they will no longer be able to obtain the benefits of having the European Patent Office conduct a preliminary search (telecommunications excepted) or examination of their applications. Nonetheless, for telecommunications inventions it is still possible and desirable for a U.S. applicant to request a search by the European Patent Office in conjunction with a PCT application. The PCT examination will then have to be conducted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

John M. Carson is a patent attorney and partner at Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP. Mr. Carson can be contacted at 619.687.8632 or jcarson@kmob.com.
 


Contact:
webmaster              Copyright © 2004 San Diego IP Assoc.